Demo  Demo   Call 800-335-0520 M-F 8am-6pm PT
  Call 800-335-0520
  M-F 8am-6pm PT

Fanminder Blog

Entries from February 2009

Our first investor

By Paul Rosenfeld on February 27th, 2009

Yesterday was a big day for FanMinder. We secured both our first investor and a very talented, new engineer.

On the investor front, things seemed to go quite easy to get to the finish line of a relationship. We both remarked “should it be this easy?” and questioned when the “other shoe was going to drop.”

But it never did.

Instead, Rob and I got to know each other of the last 2-3 months from a mutual acquaintance. He brings tremendous experience in telemarketing, as the founder and CEO of a large telemarketing firm. We hope to use telemarketing to acquire customers. Between us at FanMinder and his background, I’m looking forward to doing whatever it takes to make telemarketing pay off. Rob’s pretty sure it will – which is a huge vote of confidence for our business and strategy.

We’re running our first test once beta is up. If the test proves out, it should be a heckuva lot easier to secure angel or vc funding.

Our new engineer is Norman. I met Norman through an ex-colleague who worked with him at his last company. Norman seems terrific – great “do anything” attitude, loves our mission, seems to have strong engineering skills, and has some free time. Perfect combination.

All in all a good day. A big step forward.

Small Business FinanceWorks awarded "Most Innovative Overall"

By Paul Rosenfeld on February 13th, 2009

small_biz

What in heck is this?

It’s a product I led the development of in my last role at Intuit. Small Business FinanceWorks was just awarded the Most Innovative Award by Barlow Research, the powerhouse analyst firm for small business banking.

I’m happy for my old team and am taking a quick trip down memory lane. Tara Feldmeier, Spencer Fong, and I led the conception and development of this for a couple of years. Well, to be accurate, Tara was the “lone voice in the wilderness” before us, stumping and concepting a consumer version of FinanceWorks for something like a few years before we partnered up.

When I met Tara in 2005, I brought the small business vision to our team of two part-time engineers (even 2 part-timers were a challenge at the time.) In 2006 the larger Intuit “got religion” around online banking and a big team of us worked to complete the acquisition of Digital Insight. After the acquisition closed, we gained a big investment for our team, ramped up to 50 employees on our development team and then…well, things slowed quite a bit as we integrated Digital Insight into Intuit.

Part of it was realizing that the FinanceWorks team could develop this “front-end” application alot faster than the entire organization’s technology stack could install, integrate, and deploy it. For anyone familiar with enterprise computing environments this is reality. So we went and did some other things, slowed small business FinanceWorks a bit, gestated, and waited until the other parts caught up. Eventually things ironed out and here we are. This award showed we’ve been pointed in the right direction, and built something special, it just took some time.

I know John Barlow well and he’s a great man who’s devoted himself to evangelizing small businesses well before everyone else caught religion. Small Business FinanceWorks is likely light years ahead of most or all other services out there. Yet i can’t help but chuckle and grimace, too, that six year since Tara set-out to merge Quicken-like features with Banking, and three years since she and I sat in a cube and brainstormed this suite, it’s still considered “Most Innovative.” But of course, it is.

At the start of this project, Mark Zuckerberg probably went on his first date. I don’t even think FaceBook had launched yet. Goes to show how much change can happen in this time outside of banking. So this speaks much more to Financial Institutions’ slow pace of change rather than ordinary integration concerns when a big company acquires a small one. Thus it’s worthy of a larger lesson: If you want rapid innovation, don’t go checking “what’s in yer wallet.”

Yet hope both spring eternal in my breast. I used to dream of what we at Intuit could do if we welded together with a bank. All that information in your accounting package – customers, vendors, P&L, assets – married with the transactional services used every day by millions of small businesses.

Now we start to find out.

"An open mind starts with an open door"

By Paul Rosenfeld on February 12th, 2009

Great post says it better than I could…something I try to live by daily.

http://www.ladieswholaunch.com/magazine/daily-launchtip-february-12-2009/2833

What does a Terms of Use say about your business?

By Paul Rosenfeld on February 8th, 2009

I just finished a first draft of our Terms of Use. I’d show it to you but it’s not viewable yet and I’m not happy. I have this running love/hate relationship with them.

Terms of Use bother me but don’t seem to bother anyone else. They’re long, boring, and one-sided. Nobody looks at them. They seem to embody the worst impulses of our litigious society. Yet I care about them because I care too much for details.

So I thought “ours would be different!” Pithy, friendly, direct, like we want to be known for. Like Kayak’s but even more so. So I wrote ours with a cheeky tone. I cut out lots of words. I avoided our lawyer Kathy mostly because I didn’t want to throw both effort and money (spend $$ on Terms of Use before we even launch publicly??) against this.

So I showed a few paragraphs to the team.

Silence. Then Tracy wrote me. “If you’re trying to make a statement about who we are then at least save your effort for something people will read. Be productive why don’t ya!” Ever practical, good point Tracy. The only retort I could muster: “We’re starting with a clean sheet of paper and everything we do is an expression of who we are, and want to be. I want to send a message to our customers.”

Then I relaxed. I may be stubborn and opinionated but I do listen. So I went back to the drawing board. I’m done writing our Terms of Use and wanted to share a few thoughts:

I haven’t found the line yet between authentic/customer friendly and protecting our company.
I need Kathy our lawyer to give me more input into just the most critical terms and critical words to use. But that costs money which is wasteful to spend on this. So we’re going to have to over-protect ourselves for now. We can chop chop chop another day. Bummer!

It’s true, a Terms of Use can express who you are. This is probably the artist in me speaking. But a chunk of the Terms of Use is just expression of the decisions you make about how you want to interact with customers. Some examples:

  • When Terms get modified, will you notify people or have the customer automatically accept changes just by using the service?
  • Will you provide a grace period if a credit card expires?
  • Will you require people to call to cancel the service? Vonage just did that to me. I hate them for it and their early termination fee.
  • Will you store people’s data for some time period if they cancel the service?

There’s probably larger and better examples but these are a few that come to mind…

I did it backwards. I should have waited until all the operating decisions about the business were made for launch, then write this. So I’ll have to come back to this, but at least it’s done for now.

I’m chicken. I don’t want to destroy our company by not putting something vital into the Terms. While generally an optimist, I know there’s crazies are out there. So is it so wrong to protect our company if we’re able to, against: I don’t want to be responsible for deleting someone’s data, or sending texts to the wrong people, or a customer sending SPAM, or getting sued because we inadvertently enabled a customer to send pornographic messages, or…or…or…   or it just feels like I’m a chicken and copping out of responsibilities for our customers.

Balance is sublime. Tracy had it right. So did I. Spend time on stuff that makes a big impact. But the details make something great. Blending both perspectives could lead to the sublime one day.

The right kind of guy (or gal)

By Paul Rosenfeld on February 4th, 2009

What kind of partner, or advisor, or vendor does a start-up require? I’m not asking whether you need a lawyer or accountant or hosting provider. I’m asking “For any of these providers or advisors, what are the important characteristics they need for the relationship to benefit you?”

This seems to be a really important question because you rely on these people for critical advice and services during a very fragile time in your business’ history. These people help you take the right forks in the road.

In thinking a bit about it, we seem to be compiling a track record of choosing folks that are easy to work with, buy into our vision (at some level), and want our business even though we’re tiny. Sounds simple, right?, but there have been choices along the way that have sharpened our understanding of the spectrum of providers you can be working with.

So, do you go with the big, professional law firm with 40 offices, a marquee name, a very solid partner, and deep pockets, even willing to float you credit? Or do you choose the boutique, small firm, with a lower hourly rate that you pay out of pocket, and with a partner willing to get on the fundraising stump to help you?

Or how about going with the really big, low-cost provider for one of your back-end services? They’re filled with resources and important industry connections but getting support or sales’ attention might be difficult when you’re a flea on their proverbial arse? On the other hand, a scrappy CEO from a tiny company by comparison is calling you back on the weekend to make sure you have what you need, and is creating a custom arrangement to meet your meager cash flow early on?

We recently had the great luck and privilege to get to know a new advisor to help us acquire small merchants. After numerous sessions where we took the time to get to know each other, it’s pretty apparent we think alike, care about the same things, and approach relationships in the same way. We didn’t rush the conversation and didn’t start talking “terms” or “turkey”…it’s just flowed pretty naturally. Voila!

So what do all these have in common? The common thread is “like us” as in, “they’re like us.” I imagine that one day, if we’re HUGE and even BIG we may need different types of vendors and partners. Maybe they’ll need to be bigger or have different skills. And maybe it will stop being about relationships and be more about talking “turkey” and “capabilities” and money and the hard stuff.

True to her word, our lawyer Kathy has introduced us to many potential investors, and of course, been a pleasure to work with. Our new Gateway provider is already all over us helping us prepare our telco application. Write him an email and a reply is back in a few seconds. And our new advisor has already volunteered hours of his time where we’ve had great and critical info-sharing sessions to absorb his expertise. With the benefit of looking back, I think we’ve made three great decisions and along the way started to codify our principles through these decisions. Cool.

And if we get big and have to move on from our current team, we’re going to have to be on guard against losing that chemistry because all those little tenths of a penny are going to be whispering in our ear. I remember reading somewhere that Wal-Mart made some of its tiny suppliers big as it grew and wouldn’t that be great to do the same for people that believed in us early on.

 
How it Works  |  Features  |  Why Mobile?  |  Learning Center  |  Partner Programs  |  Contact Us  |  FAQs  |  Privacy  |  Terms© Copyright 2010 Fanminder